Posting, Protesting or Staying Silent in Times of Crisis
Frustrated by corruption and the display of wealth allegedly amassed through mismanaged public funds, Nepali Gen Z launched a TikTok trend exposing the lavish lifestyles of government officials and their families, luxuries unattainable for the average citizen. When the government implemented a nationwide social media ban, it became the final straw for young people, who saw it as a direct attack on their right to free speech. Initially, prominent online personalities with large followings, many of whom also depend on social media for their livelihood, echoed this sentiment. But as protests escalated, many influencers went silent, revealing that their earlier support was less about principle and more about convenience.
Influencers and public figures hold immense power to shape culture and challenge the status quo. In today’s digital world, where it takes only minutes to share a message with thousands, their voices can spark real change.
The question is: Are they truly aware of the responsibility that comes with the influence they hold?
Why would we not contribute to making things better, especially when it is the same people who built the platform that gave us influence? That said, I also respect that using one’s platform to speak out is a personal choice; everyone should have the freedom to decide for themselves.
Pooja Giri
Model, Wedding Planner
In what ways, were you a part of the Gen Z Revolution?
Pooja: I would say I was part of it simply as another citizen of the country, someone who has carried the same concerns for years, just waiting for the right moment to unite with others and push for change. I saw a generation demanding change and I knew I had to be part of it. I connected deeply with Gen Z’s bold expression and their willingness to challenge the norm, especially on issues like corruption, lack of transparency, and limited economic opportunities. These were not just Gen Z issues; they were national issues that had become impossible to ignore.
I used my voice and resources to support the movement amplifying their message, showing up at rallies, visiting the injured personally, just contributing wherever I could. This time, it was never about going against any individual or institution for personal gain, this time it was about standing together for the future of our country.
Siddhartha: As someone followed by a large number of young people, I felt a deep responsibility to speak up during the Gen Z Revolution. The power this generation holds today is truly remarkable. When I saw so many young voices rising for the sake of our country, I could not remain silent. Corruption has been at its peak, and I believed that if more of us raised our voices, real change could finally take place.
Yozana: I actively participated in the protest both days. I like to keep myself informed about the situation in my country. We ran a few online discussions on the aftermath of the movement with active participation of 20k+ youth.
Dikshya: Being a Gen Z, I carry the sentiment of the movement. While many of my friends played a more active role in organising the protest, I could not directly participate. As a media professional working for the state television, NTV, my profession does not allow me to do so. Nevertheless, as a lawyer and more importantly, as a citizen of this country, I helped amplify the voices of the movement through my social platforms by providing legal opinions during a period of political uncertainty and raising awareness through my initiatives.
What made you decide to speak up and act or remain silent during this time?
When I saw so many young voices rising for the sake of our country, I could not remain silent. Corruption has been at its peak, and I believed that if more of us raised our voices, real change could finally take place.
Siddhartha Ghimire
Food Blogger
Pooja: I always felt the need to speak up because of the failures and disappointments I saw in the country and its system. It felt like the way things were running left no reason for young people to stay and build their future here. Staying silent felt like allowing injustice to continue. I believed that even small actions when combined can lead to meaningful change. So, I chose to raise my voice and support the movement because I wanted to be part of shaping a better future for everyone. If not us, then who will speak up?
Siddhartha: It was the hope that if every individual came to the streets and raised their concerns for the country, something would shift. That hope for a better Nepal is what gave me the courage to act. I even created a video encouraging people to come together and raise their voices in a safe space because collective action is where true strength lies. To remain silent in this moment would have been to turn away from that hope.
Yozana: I have always been vocal about politics and corruption. This movement stood out for me because it was the revolution of Gen Z, the young people who are the future of the country. Furthermore, corruption has always been a big problem for Nepal not just in democracy, corruption has been around for too long. It is about time we work together to put an end to it.
Dikshya: After the deadly unrest on September 8 in front of BICC Hall where police used force against young protesters and the news reported the death toll rising from one to 15, by the time I reached home, my body froze. As I contemplated what was happening, I felt a deep sense of responsibility to call out the government for its insensitivity toward the protesters.
Do you think people with influence have a responsibility to use their platforms during political or social movements?
People who feel responsible will always come forward. And we should focus on people who did come forward rather than directing our energy in being angry on those who did not. This will only drain us, it is not productive in any way.
Yozana Thapa Magar
Comedian
Pooja: What I believe is that influencers are created by the people themselves; without the support of the audience, these platforms would not even exist. For me, speaking up is not just a duty; it should be a feeling – a required voice to drive positive change in the society we all live in. Why would we not contribute to making things better, especially when it is the same people who built the platform that gave us influence? That said, I also respect that using one’s platform to speak out is a personal choice; everyone should have the freedom to decide for themselves.
Siddhartha: Yes, for many, and no, for some. I truly believe that if your work is to connect with people online, then when the country is in crisis, it is important to speak. Silence in such moments can feel like turning away from the very people who trust and follow you. That being said, I think it is important to recognise the difference between an influencer and a content creator. An influencer is someone people look up to, who shares opinions, experiences and facts that directly influence their audience. They have the platform, the voice, and the capability to craft meaningful statements. Because of this, I believe influencers carry a responsibility to speak up during political and social movements, especially when their words can inspire collective action for the betterment of the nation.
Content creators, however, are slightly different. Many are specialised in their own creative fields, often working with scripts written by others or content shaped by companies. In these cases, stepping into political or social commentary without proper understanding or preparation can be risky. It can lead to misinformation or unintended consequences. For content creators, I think speaking out is still possible but it must be done carefully with access to valid sources, accurate information and a clear message. So, while I strongly believe influencers should use their platforms responsibly during such times, for content creators, the decision comes with greater caution. Both roles are powerful but they carry different levels of responsibility.
Yozana: They definitely do. That being said, we should not drag or attack anyone if they chose not to. It is completely their choice. We can request them when needed, but they ‘CAN’ deny and choose to remain silent. People who feel responsible will always come forward. And we should focus on people who did come forward rather than directing our energy in being angry on those who did not. This will only drain us, it is not productive in any way.
Dikshya: Content creators have a responsibility to utilise their platforms during such a crisis to educate the public. This is the time when misinformation spreads rapidly, emotions run high and people are searching for clarity. By using their influence responsibly, creators can fact-check, provide reliable updates and amplify the voices of those directly affected. Remaining silent in such moments risks normalising injustice, whereas speaking up can empower communities and contribute to positive change.
How did you see other individuals with influence respond, and what stood out for you about their choices?
Siddhartha: The movement initially started with ordinary people online speaking out against corruption. A social media trend that began in Indonesia had made its way to Nepal, and we all witnessed it gaining momentum. Then, the social media ban happened which affected many content creators like myself, since social media is our bread and butter. The anger over the ban and the frustration with corruption became intertwined. Many creators I follow such as Elena Don, Priya Sigdel, Himesh Panta and Silvia Raut, took strong stances during this time. They spoke out about the movement and continue to use their platforms to discuss its aftermath. What stood out for me was how collective efforts and united voices could amplify awareness and influence people. Seeing peers take a stand, despite risks and challenges, highlighted the power and responsibility we hold as creators in shaping public conversations.
Yozana: A lot of young creators were very much vocal and up front for the most part of the protest which made me really happy because I could see that many youngsters were actively engaging in the conversations and on the street. It was often implied that the young generation are not very interested in politics and the system, this definitely turned the narrative around. Because of this, I am sure the next generation will also be an active part of the governance which is at the core of democracy. It is the system of the people, by the people and for the people. And people are finally taking charge.
Dikshya: It was truly exemplary. The decision of one creator often sets off a domino effect among peers, and I found myself influenced as well. People were creative with their content during the crisis, some were breaking down the Constitution, a few were distributing food and essentials, while others were educating themselves to disseminate only credible information.
Did you consider any risks or opportunities when deciding whether to post or not post on social media about the movement?
Remaining silent in such moments risks normalising injustice, whereas speaking up can empower communities and contribute to positive change.
Dikshya Awasthi
Lawyer, Model
Pooja: Risk? Honestly, never. Why would I hesitate or calculate risks when it is about my own country, the place I have to live in and call home? The moment I learned about this movement, my heart was ready without a second thought. As for opportunity, I hope you mean the chance to live in a Nepal that is free from corruption, safe and truly beautiful, something we all deserve. This movement was about the change we have long dreamed of, the change we have hoped would create a better future for our country. Unfortunately, that change came at a huge cost, we lost many innocent lives. I only wish I had understood those risks sooner.
Siddhartha: I was clear on one thing from the start: the movement was led by Gen Z, and majority of my audience falls within that age bracket. I felt a responsibility to guide them encouraging them to protest safely, take water, wear masks and be responsible on the streets. On September 7, I made two videos emphasizing safe spaces and highlighting that if we raised our voices collectively, positive change could happen. Those videos received a total of five million views, and people appreciated that I used my platform to support a constructive cause. At the time, I had no idea the protest would take a darker turn, where over 70 innocent lives were lost. Later that evening, I posted another video encouraging people to continue raising their voices, and as a food blogger, I also recommended local places to eat. My intention was simply to continue my work supporting local eateries which I have been doing for over 10 years. Unfortunately, some people misinterpreted this as promotion during a protest, ignoring my earlier videos and spreading negativity. I had to delete the latter video, I did apologise, but the misunderstanding had already spread widely. I reflected on it and asked myself: did I use the protest for promotion? Absolutely not. I had no idea the events would turn tragic, and my focus was always on safe participation and constructive support. Even as a food content creator, I continued to support local businesses without any personal gain. This experience taught me that using your platform responsibly comes with risks, but integrity and intent matter the most.
Yozana: Usually I do not really care about risks before posting. If I feel like saying something on a public platform, I just go ahead. I never really shy away from putting my political or social opinions forward. And I did post everything I wanted about this revolution as well. However, this time, it came with a lot of guilt.
Although I never posted or shared anything that encouraged violence, since this was a shared experience, I did feel a bit responsible for the lost lives, injuries and damages sustained by the country. I am sure a lot of people feel the same way.
Dikshya: In times of crisis, people often lose their logical sense and rely on emotions to react to the situation. In my experience, I would think carefully, take time to process my emotions, multiple times, then choose my words and actions. For me, being a lawyer provided the right opportunity to educate people with my expertise.
What would you like to tell people who call you opportunistic for being involved in the movement?
Pooja: Again, an opportunity to build your nation by giving your honest input? Oh yes, absolutely! That is the kind of opportunity worth seizing. Contributing to the future of your country is not just a responsibility we all share, it is a privilege. I understand that people will always have different opinions, black or white, but that should not matter when you are fighting for a just cause. Yes, some will judge or even try to backlash you, but if your actions come from a place of genuine intention and commitment to a better future, then all those baseless accusations do not hold weight. Even if the whole world is against you, standing up for what is right is never being opportunistic, it is being courageous. So, I urge everyone to use whatever platform they have and do whatever they can to make a positive difference. We are building “Naya Nepal”
Siddhartha: I cannot control what people choose to say. I focus on doing my work properly, and when important voices need to be raised, I speak up. I am a food content creator and my work revolves around food, but people expect more from me because I have been around for a long time and I respect that responsibility. During the protest, I was not in Nepal as I live in Australia, but my team was there, and I instructed them to attend safely. Even from abroad, I raised my voice on social media to support the movement. Anyone who calls me opportunistic should check my social platforms. I have always supported young entrepreneurs, local cafés, and family run eateries never taking money in return. My platform exists because of the people, and I have always wanted to give back. After all that, if some still choose to label me opportunistic to satisfy themselves, so be it. My focus remains on using my platform responsibly and supporting the community in meaningful ways.
Yozana: Nobody has called me that. At least not to my face. And if they cannot say that to me directly, then I do not really care. I also do not think that I have a big enough following for that. It will sound funny, but I do not believe people care if I am involved in a movement or not. Even if I am being called opportunistic in this particular movement, I do not think it is a big deal. The movement is bigger than my petty issues. Perhaps it is because I have a big mouth and I feel compelled to speak up, but I have always been involved in such movements and will continue to do so in the future.
Dikshya: Being a responsible citizen does not make you opportunistic, it is our duty, especially in times of crisis. Moreover, this movement was initiated by the young generation, the Gen Z. These are our voices, and we too are victims of a corrupt system.
Text: Kreenjala Pyakurel
